Bankruptcy and Pensions/RRSPs April 17, 2015 Robert A. Klotz This article reviews the problems imposed by bankruptcy on an equalization claim where a principal asset of the bankrupt spouse is a pension or RRSP.
Protecting Equality in the Context of a Separate but Equal Regime April 17, 2015 Adam N. Black A case comment on the Court of Appeal for Ontario’s decision in Hincks v. Gallardo.
Diamonds are Forever... Not Really April 07, 2015 Andrew Sudano While a family law case surrounding the return of an engagement ring remains a thorny business at best, Andrew Sudano examines some ways that one party may be able to have the engagement ring returned.
The Canada Pension Plan: Credit Splitting February 19, 2015 Ilana Zylberman Dembo and Sarah Troper In situations where it is difficult to determine whether there will be an overall financial loss for the parties should their CPP credits be split, "it often makes sense for the parties to agree to review the question at a later time, closer to when they are about to apply for CPP and their history of contributions is known."
The Diner Brief: The Avenue Cafe and Bistro February 19, 2015 Georgina Carson The latest in a series of where to eat when you are at court
Message from the Chair February 18, 2015 Steven Benmor The 2015 Bencher election will be held on April 13. Consider the issues facing the profession.
Compartmentalizing Childhood- Adult Thinking February 18, 2015 Jeffrey Wilson One of the benefits of a juristic approach that requires each legal case concerning a child to turn on its own particular facts is that all of the child must be considered.
Are Lawyers 'Mindful'? February 18, 2015 Steven Benmor Are lawyers aware of their attitudes, perceptions, beliefs, biases, stress level and anxiety and, most importantly, how those factors influence their judgment?
"Call of Duty": Court of Appeal's Moore Decision Clarifies Experts' Duties of Independence February 18, 2015 Michael H. Tweyman Is it appropriate for counsel to review a draft expert's report, and hold communications with the expert? Does this inherently conflict with the expert's duty to be independent?