Articles 2020

Today
Today

Bill C-11’s Foundational Faults, Part Two: The Regulate-It-All Approach of Treating All Audio-Visual Content as a “Program”

  • March 25, 2022
  • Michael Geist

My first post on Bill C-11 focused on the virtually limitless reach of the CRTC’s jurisdictional power over audio-visual services. The expansive approach in Bill C-11 isn’t limited to its jurisdictional reach, however. Not only does the law have few limits with respect to which services are regulated, it is similarly over-broad with respect to what is regulated, featuring definitions that loop all AV content into the law by treating all AV content as a “program” subject to potential regulation.

Entertainment, Media and Communications Law, Student Forum

OBA Insurance Law Section – Spotlight Interview with Sandra LeBrun

  • March 24, 2022

In an interview with Insurance Law Section member-at large Harold Geller, Sandra LeBrun, in-house counsel at Aviva Trial Lawyers (Ottawa Office), talks about her career path, her involvement in the insurance bar and broader legal community, her most memorable court appearance, her advice for junior lawyers, and more.

Insurance Law, Student Forum

No Liability for Infringing Comparative Advertising

  • March 18, 2022
  • May M. Cheng

The Quebec Court of Appeal decision in Constellation Brands US Operations Inc. v. Société de vin internationale ltée 2021 QCCA 1664 has received a lot of attention for its discussion of when comparative advertising constitutes infringement and whether comparative advertising can depreciate goodwill. However, the case is noteworthy for its consideration of the court’s discretion to refuse to grant an accounting of profits after having found infringement, and this merits more discussion.

Entertainment, Media and Communications Law, Student Forum
Head shot photo of Emma Katz

A New Tort of Family Violence: Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia

  • March 18, 2022
  • Emma Katz

Emma Katz reviews the newest member of the tort law family, the tort of family violence. This tort was recently recognized by Mandhane J. and is expected to provide new and potentially significant relief in cases of family violence.

Family Law, Student Forum
Head shot photo of Diana Mojica

An Interview with Diana Mojica: Keeping a Positive Perspective

  • March 18, 2022
  • Laura Pettigrew

The article is a summary of an interview with Diana Mojica, a public sector lawyer and member of the Public Sector Lawyers Section Executive.

Canadian Corporate Counsel Association - Ontario Chapter, Public Sector Lawyers, Student Forum

Court of Appeal Summaries (March 7-11, 2022)

  • March 18, 2022
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of March 7, 2022.

Civil Litigation, Student Forum
Head shot photo of Lauren J. Dalton

Featured Member: Lauren J. Dalton

  • March 18, 2022
  • Lauren J. Dalton

Our guest star for March's "Featured Member" series is Lauren J. Dalton, current newsletter editor and incoming chair of the International Business Law Committee. Lauren is an associate in the Corporate & Financial Services Department of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP in New York. We thank Lauren for her participation and hope you enjoy getting to know her!

Business Law, Student Forum

The Ontario HVAC Rental Scam

  • March 17, 2022
  • Dennis G. Crawford, MONTEITH RITSMA PHILLIPS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

This article outlines the "Ontario HVAC Scam," which exploits loopholes in consumer protection laws and the real property registration system to dupe unsuspecting homeowners.

Real Property Law, Student Forum

Section 17 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, 2019 Declared Unconstitutional

  • March 16, 2022
  • Katrina Crocker, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP / S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l.

In a motion to pursue a class action against the Ontario Provincial Police brought by Caledonia residents arising from Caledonia’s road and rail blockade by protestors in 2020, the Superior Court invalidated the mandatory stay arising from section 17 of the CLPA due to its inconsistency with section 96 of the Constitution Act.

Class Actions, Student Forum