Articles

The Supreme Court of Canada has just ruled on constructive dismissal, good faith dealings and administrative suspensions. The case is an important review of the law surrounding the expectations for employers in managing employees and processes to be followed in taking unilateral action including through the implementation of an administrative suspension.

In the recent of Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canada Labour Code permits without cause terminations. In other words, without cause terminations are not automatically unjust dismissals under the Code. An adjudicator must examine the circumstances of the particular case to see whether the dismissal is “unjust.”

On January 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark decision in which the Court ruled that Mounties have the right to engage in meaningful collective bargaining with their employer.

In the last ten years social media has exploded into popular culture and has entered almost every aspect of daily life. The question of how this relates to workplace law remains open.

Concern about the impartiality of expert evidence seized the spotlight when a trial decision issued last year in Moore v. Getahun criticized legal counsel for getting too involved in the preparation of an expert’s written report. The decision sent shockwaves through the legal community and among those who provide expert testimony. Fortunately, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has restored relative calm in a recent decision.

While the notion of a fixed term employment contract may seem like a straight-forward matter, this is not always the case. How a fixed term contract may come to an end without further liability requires careful drafting, monitoring and action. Even when this appears to have been the case, one Alberta-based employer suffered a rude and expensive surprise due to its failure to strictly adhere to the precise terms of the agreement (Thompson v. Cardel Homes Limited Partnership).

A synopsis of the most important decisions from last year

The License Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) provides some much needed guidance regarding the potential penalties for non-compliance with the AODA.

The Supreme Court expands the principle of good faith as a general organizing principle.

Ontario Court of Appeal Reviews two OLRB Decisions