Articles 2022

Today
Today

Should You Use a Pierringer Agreement?

  • May 26, 2017
  • Julia Vizzaccaro

Julia explores the benefits and pitfalls of using Pierringer (proportionate share) agreements in the context of contaminated sites litigation.

Environmental Law

The Environmental Review Tribunal Restricts the Use of Notices of Allegation

  • May 25, 2017
  • Harry Dahme, Jessica Boily and Benjamin Ojoleck

The authors discuss the Environmental Review Tribunal's decisions in Rubin v Ontario (Environment and Climate Change), [2016] OERTD No 20 and Technical Standards and Safety Authority v Kawartha Lakes (City), [2016] OERTD No 8.. In these decisions, the Tribunal explored the purpose of Notices of Allegation against third parties in appeals of environmental orders.

Environmental Law

Logging Companies Fined $2.2 Million Under the Fisheries Act

  • March 20, 2017
  • Paula Boutis

Paula reports on the B.C. Provincial Court sentencing decision in R. v. Gwaii Wood Products Ltd., et al, 2017 BCPC 6 for convictions on charges under section 35(1) of the Fisheries Act resulting from logging and road construction that resulted in the harmful alteration, destruction or disruption of fish habitat.

Environmental Law

Statutory Right to Compensation for Remediation Applies to Spills Occurring Before the Right was in Force

  • March 20, 2017
  • Stan Berger

Stan comments on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice trial decision of March 6, 2017 in Huang v. Fraser Hillary's Limited, 2017,. ONSC 1500. The trial court awarded the plaintiff compensation under s.99(2) of the Environmental Protection Act for dry cleaning solvent contamination on its property that was allowed to enter the defendant's property in the 1960s and 1970s, up until 1974.

Environmental Law

Director and Officer Liability Post Midwest

  • February 28, 2017
  • Tamara Farber

Tamara discusses director and officer liability in the wake of the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson, 2015 OCA 819 where John Thordarson and his company, Thorco Contracting Limited were held to be jointly and severally liable for $1,328,000 in remediation costs to Midwest under section 99(2) of the Environmental Protection Act.

Environmental Law