Articles 2023

Today
Today

Legality of Detention in Long-Term Care and Retirement Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • March 04, 2021
  • Jane E. Meadus, staff lawyer / institutional advocate, Advocacy Centre for the Elderly

While it is understood that drastic measures must be taken to reduce the risk of COVID-19 to residents across Ontario, especially those living in congregate care settings, this does not give the government carte blanche authority to restrict the liberty of Ontario’s citizens. Any restrictions must be carefully drafted and made in accordance with the rule of law.

Elder Law, Student Forum

Cultural Competency in Elder Law

  • March 04, 2021
  • Thijiba Sinnathamby, TSJ Law, thijiba@tsjlaw.ca

A look at providing legal services to Canada's increasingly diverse population.

Elder Law, Student Forum

Should We Amend the Health Care Consent Act to Allow Unilateral Removal of Ventilators?

  • March 04, 2021
  • Lisa Feldstein, Lisa Feldstein Law Office, lisa@lisafeldstein.ca

If COVID-19 overwhelms hospital resources, should the Ontario government consider a recommendation for an Executive Order to temporarily suspend the law requiring doctors to obtain consent of patients or families before withdrawing a life-sustaining treatment?

Elder Law, Student Forum

Objection, Your Honour! Can class members dispute settlement orders in class actions?

  • March 04, 2021
  • Daniel MacDonald, student caseworker – Class Action Clinic | Windsor Law

A feature unique to class actions is that class members are not always happy with settlements. Occasionally, class members object to settlements but judges approve them anyway. Is there recourse for class members when this situation arises? Alberta Court of Appeal ruled in Macaronies Hair Club and Laser Center Inc. v Bank of Montreal that unhappy class members have no right to appeal a settlement order and have no other recourse.

Class Actions, Student Forum

The Power To Be Bold: A New Chapter for Novel Claims in Class Proceedings

  • March 04, 2021
  • Craig Lockwood and Stephen Armstrong, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Novel claims present a significant challenge for courts in the context of interlocutory proceedings such as motions to strike or amend pleadings, or to certify class proceedings. In Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, the Supreme Court of Canada provided welcome guidance on how courts should approach motions to strike pleadings of novel causes of action. Notably, the Court held that a plaintiff’s claim will not survive a motion to strike simply because it is novel.

Class Actions, Student Forum

Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc.: Finally, the First Decision on the Merits of a Securities Class Action Alleging Secondary Market Misrepresentation

  • March 04, 2021
  • Michael Rosenberg, Caroline H. Humphrey, Aya Schechner, McCarthy Tétrault LLP

The OSC has finally decided the merits of a class action under the secondary market liability provisions of the Ontario Securities Act. Belobaba, J. began by noting that “leave to proceed will be granted if there is enough evidence to clear the ‘reasonable possibility’ hurdle,” but “when the matter is litigated in full and the plaintiff’s hurdle is the more demanding ‘balance of probabilities’, the defendants may prevail and the securities class action will be dismissed."

Class Actions, Natural Resources and Energy Law, Student Forum

A Recap of PD Programming: Effective Advocacy Before Health Discipline Committees

  • March 03, 2021
  • Carina Lentsch, ACL LAW - www.acllaw.ca

Effective advocacy in health law requires the ability to argue before a variety of adjudicators. Read this summary of the OBA Health Law Section's recent PD program on Advocating before Health Discipline Committees and gain valuable insights from the decision-makers themselves about how counsel can advocate effectively for their clients at health discipline committee hearings.

Health Law, Student Forum
Cassandra Ma

Waiting to Act Is Not a Reasonable Option: Workplace Health and Safety in the Time of Coronavirus

  • March 03, 2021
  • Cassandra Ma, labour and employment legal counsel at Canada Post Corporation

As the COVID-19 pandemic concludes its first year, we have seen a slow release of decisions assessing infectious disease prevention policies. From the applicable jurisprudence, a central theme has emerged: an employer’s duty to take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of a worker under section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act will be interpreted expansively where catastrophic injury and loss of life may arise from an unknown hazard.

Labour and Employment Law, Student Forum

Meet Your Practitioners: Medical Malpractice Edition

  • March 03, 2021
  • Jonathan Farine, introduction by Carina Lentsch, ACL LAW

We are excited to share with you the insights of five prominent members of the bar with extensive experience in medical malpractice litigation, both from the perspective of plaintiffs and defence counsel. Whether you are currently working on medical malpractice files, considering a career in this interesting and complex area of litigation, or are just curious about what senior members of the bar who practice in this field have to say about their work, read on.

Health Law, Student Forum