Articles

About Articles The following articles are published by the Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law Law Section of the Ontario Bar Association. Members are encouraged to submit articles.

Editors: Ayush Arora and Victoria Di Felice

Today
Today

Bypassing a Subscription Paywall Violates Technological Protection Measure Provisions in Copyright Act, Negates Fair Dealing Defence

  • May 17, 2016
  • Lorraine Fleck

An Ontario court recently ruled in 395804 Ontario Limited c.o.b. as Blacklock's Reporter v. Canadian Vintners Association and Dan Paszkowski that circumventing a subscription paywall to access a news article violates the technological protection measure (TPM) provisions in Canada's Copyright Act, and negates the fair dealing defence to copyright infringement available under Canadian law.

Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law

Federal Court of Appeal Changes Test on Interlocutory/Discretionary Appeals

  • June 05, 2015
  • Andrew Skodyn

In the recent decision of Imperial Manufacturing Group Inc. v. Decor Grates Incorporated, 2015 FCA 100, the Federal Court of Appeal used an appeal of a particulars motion in an industrial designs case to eliminate the prior distinction between the standard of review of discretionary or interlocutory orders and all other appeals from the Federal Court.

Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law

European Court of Justice Widens Digital Library Rights

  • March 03, 2015
  • Roselyn Kelada-Sedra

In September 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled to allow libraries to digitize and distribute books to reading terminals without a digitization licence.

Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law

Federal Court Rejects Non-infringing Alternative Defence; Apotex ordered to pay over $100M to Eli Lilly in cefaclor damages reference

  • February 24, 2015
  • Cameron Weir

On January 23, 2015, the Federal Court released its decision on the quantum of damages in the cefaclor (Eli Lilly’s Ceclor) litigation: Eli Lilly and Company et al v Apotex Inc, 2014 FC 1254. This article provides a summary of that decision, which is only the second Federal Court decision which quantifies a damages remedy in a pharmaceutical patent infringement proceeding.

New and Emerging ISO Standards for Outsourcing

New and Emerging ISO Standards for Outsourcing

  • February 03, 2015
  • Matt Wanford and Sam Ip

An overview of the new standards relevant to outsourcing, and in particular, the following: (1) ISO 37500:2014 on Outsourcing; (2) ISO/IEC 27018:2014 on Cloud Privacy; and (3) ISO/IEC CD 27017 (draft) on Cloud Security.

Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law

Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) seeks declaration of invalidity and non-infringement of Long QT syndrome gene patents

  • December 09, 2014
  • Cameron Weir

The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) has recently sought a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement of certain patents covering genes implicated in Long QT syndrome, an inherited cardiac disorder. This case is drawing considerable interest from stakeholders, as Canadian courts have yet to directly consider the issue of whether isolated human genes are patentable under Canadian patent law.

Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law

Ontario Wireless Services Agreements Act In-force

  • December 09, 2014
  • Matthew Wanford

On April 1, 2014, Ontario’s Wireless Services Agreement Act (WSAA) came into force. The WSAA applies to consumer wireless agreements (Agreements) entered into or renewed after April 1, 2014, where, at the time when the transaction took place, the supplier of the wireless services or the consumer was located in Ontario. The WSAA is intended to supplement the protections under the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 (CPA) and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) code.

Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law