Articles 2025

Today
Today

Issues with Annual Holdback Release and Lien Expiry on P3 Projects and Beyond

  • January 08, 2025
  • Jay Nathwani, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP, and Josh Strub, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP

The pending amendments to the Construction Act (“the Act”) include a new requirement for the annual release of holdback, without the right to set off against holdback. However, while implementing a number of significant changes to the Act, the Legislature elected not to close an identified gap in the Act related to Public Private Partnership (“P3”) projects. As a result, a significant issue is created in the context of mandatory annual holdback released on P3 projects in Ontario.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum

Breaking Down the Walls: A Series on Construction Delay

  • January 07, 2025
  • Gary Brummer, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP; Jacob Lokash, associate, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP; Thomas Certo, senior director, Ankura Consulting Group LLC

In the fast-paced world of construction, delays can pose significant challenges to project success. In this Breaking Down the Walls series we simplify the fundamentals of construction delays, providing readers with the necessary tools to proactively identify and assess delays on their own projects in Canada, and focus on the damages that are often claimed as a result of schedule delay.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum

How to Lien a Mine in Ontario

  • January 07, 2025
  • Edward W. Lynde and Paul Hancock

The type of property interest a mining company has in the lands dictates the manner in which liens are preserved and perfected. Consequently, when liening lands on which a mine is located the paramount consideration is determining the nature of the owner’s interest in the mining claim.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Natural Resources and Energy Law, Student Forum

Reflections Upon a Career in Construction Law: Five Easy Pieces

  • January 07, 2025
  • Geza Banfai, counsel, McMillan LLP

This is the third article in the 2024-2025 Newsletter’s Reflections series, featuring reflections on extraordinary careers by senior counsel in the construction bar.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum

Selected Reflections on a Career: Harvey J. Kirsh

  • January 07, 2025
  • Harvey J. Kirsh, arbitrator | mediator | adjudicator | referee, Kirsh Construction ADR Services Ltd.

This is the second article in the 2024-2025 Newsletter’s Reflections series, featuring reflections on extraordinary careers by senior counsel in the construction bar.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum
photo of authors Simren Sihota, associate, and Gary Brummer, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP

Does a Direct Payment to Subcontractors Under Section 28 of the Construction Act Reduce Lien Security? It Depends.

  • January 07, 2025
  • Simren Sihota, associate, and Gary Brummer, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP

The recent Divisional Court case of Demikon Construction Ltd. v. Oakleigh Holdings Inc., 2024 ONSC 6261 establishes that reliance on a direct payment pursuant to s. 28 of the Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30 is only valid if that payment was made to a person “having a lien." Failing to ensure compliance may not result in such a payment being a proper basis to reduce lien security posted into court.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum
photo of author Jay Nathwani

Liability for Flow-Through Claims: A Puzzling Aspect of Walsh v. TTC

  • October 21, 2024
  • Jay Nathwani, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP

An 849-paragraph testament to the grinding weight of our civil justice system, the decision in Walsh Construction v. Toronto Transit Commission et al., 2024 ONSC 2782, was arrived at after a trial stretching over 19 months. In spite of the achievement that the decision represents, its findings on flow-through claims of subcontractors represent a potentially troubling precedent for the industry, and are puzzling as a matter of law. They bear further scrutiny on the appeal currently underway.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum

The Use of AI Tools for Expert Work

  • October 21, 2024
  • Augusto Patmore, P. Eng, MBA (Delay Expert), A&M managing director

Time is of the essence when it comes to the role of a delay expert in a construction dispute. With cases increasingly involving vast amounts of data, AI has become a formidable tool for delay experts. However, AI tools are not without their limitations. Human oversight is still crucial to ensure both reasonableness and accuracy in legal proceedings.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum
photos of authors Sharon, Jacob and Jay

Ontario Court Clarifies Test for Owner’s Liability Under OHSA

  • October 21, 2024
  • Jay Nathwani, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP; Sharon Sam, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP; and Jacob Lokash, associate, Margie Strub Construction Law LLP

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently provided insight into what steps an owner must take to establish a defence of due diligence and avoid liability under the Ontario Occupation Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1 (“OHSA”).

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum
photo of Duncan Glaholt

Reflections on a Career

  • October 21, 2024
  • Duncan Glaholt

This is the first article in the 2024-2025 Newsletter’s Reflections series, featuring reflections on extraordinary careers by senior counsel in the construction bar. We are grateful to Duncan Glaholt for inaugurating this series.

Construction and Infrastructure Law, Student Forum