Articles

About Articles The below articles are published by the Civil Litigation Section of the Ontario Bar Association. Members are encouraged to submit articles.  About Articles

Editors: Saba Ahmad and Stefan M. Case

Today
Today

Blaney's Appeals: Court of Appeal Summaries (December 16 – 20, 2019)

  • January 06, 2020
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Following are this week’s summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. In Sosnowski v. MacEwen Petroleum Inc., the Court appears to have unconvincingly dialed back how far the “appropriate means” test can go to extend the limitation period. In this case, the employee waited until he was acquitted of theft (which took six years, including appeals) before suing for wrongful dismissal (he had been fired for cause because of the alleged theft).

Civil Litigation, Student Forum

Blaney's Appeals: Court of Appeal Summaries (November 18 – 22, 2019)

  • November 28, 2019
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the past week. Topics covered include wrongful dismissal, custody/relocation, equalization of net family property, charging orders under the Solicitors Act, and rental vehicle insurance coverage.

Civil Litigation, Student Forum

Blaney's Appeals: Court of Appeal Summaries (November 4 – 8 2019)

  • November 14, 2019
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Congratulations to Blaney's Chad Kopach for successfully acting in First National Financial GP Corporation v. Golden Dragon HO 10 Inc. The case involved a motion by a receiver for directions in respect of the debtors’ appeal of a sales approval and vesting order. The sale and vesting order were preserved.

Civil Litigation, Student Forum

Blaney's Appeals: Court of Appeal Summaries (October 28 – November 1 2019)

  • November 06, 2019
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Ramkey Communications Inc. v. Labourers’ International Union of North America involved an appeal of a judicial review of a construction union certification application. In allowing the appeal, the Court determined that the Divisional Court had misapplied the Tessier test. The result meant that the “construction technicians” were allowed to unionize under provincial labour laws and not regulated by federal labour laws.

Civil Litigation, Student Forum