Resources

A critical discussion on the experience of trans* people in schools, shelters, prisons, and other public institutions. Learn from our expert panel as they unravel the issues of sex and gender diversity.

As the “sandwich generation” is increasingly responsible for the care of both parents and children, accommodating family status in the workplace has become a live issue for employers.

Emerging Trends in Constitutional Law: Where the Supreme Court Has Been and What Does It Mean for Counsel in Constitutional Litigation?

Peel Law Association v. Pieters, 2013 ONCA 396 (CanLII). Discussion of this important decision and its implications for human rights law in Ontario.

The Report of the Honourable Frank Iacobucci into First Nations representation on Ontario juries considers and provides immediate practical suggestions to increase representation.

In the recent landmark decision of Daniels v. Canada, the Federal Court ended twelve years of litigation, holding that Métis and non-status Aboriginal peoples are “Indians” for purposes of s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The last few months have seen a flurry of high profile activity in the area of elections law: from administrative irregularities and voter registration in the Supreme Court’s decision in Opitz v. Wrzesnewskyj,, to conflict of interest regulation in Magder v Ford...

Andrew Pinto was appointed to conduct a review of the new Ontario Human Rights system created from fundamental changes to the Human Rights Code effective June 30, 2008.

Joseph J. Arvay Q.C. is unquestionably one of Canada’s leading constitutional litigators. He has been counsel on numerous landmark constitutional law cases.

In December 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Reference re Securities Act. The unanimous court rejected the federal government's proposed national Securities Act as unconstitutional.