Articles 2024

Summary of a case where the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the pre-trial conference.

Cases this week include 704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, as well as a case stemming from a series of tweets; one that focused on Facebook postings; another involving a doctor who sued a lawyer who posted an email on the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association “Listserv”; an action based on an internet post; and a case about a political candidate who had a 25-year-old criminal conviction.

An update on what the Supreme Court of Canada has been doing so far this year and a preview of what we can expect for the balance of the year.

Following are the summaries for this week’s civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. One noteworthy decision released relates to Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Almost 10 years have passed since Madoff’s confession!

Topics covered this week include applications for release from immigration detention pursuant to the Habeas Corpus Act and related infringement of Charter rights, as well as collateral attacks relating to leave applications for appealing a costs award.

This week’s summaries include two property boundary disputes between neighbours, a child custody decision, several criminal decisions, and a couple of Ontario Review Board decisions.

Topics covered in our summaries of this week’s civil decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal include crown wardship, constructive dismissal, partial summary judgment, unjust enrichment as a result of an overpayment by an insurer, a construction lien action, and a claim for negligent investigation and related torts against the police and Fire Marshall in a case of arson by negligence.

Topics covered in this week's summaries include the validity of a will of someone with chronic alcoholism and an application for habeas corpus in the immigration law context.

Topics covered this week included the breach of an agreement of purchase and sale of land, whether a termination clause in an employment contract violated the Employment Standards Act, and the appeal route when seeking to review an order of a single judge of the Divisional Court (to a panel of that court, not to the Court of Appeal).

Topics covered this week include automobile insurance coverage in the leasing context, family law, limitation periods in the breach of contract context, the need for expert evidence on the standard of care on a summary judgment motion in the professional negligence context, administrative law in the software development tax credit context, and vexatious litigants.