In late 2024, Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), under Minister Marc Miller, implemented significant policy changes reshaping Canada's immigration framework. While the government presents these measures as necessary adjustments, critics argue they tighten pathways to permanent residency (PR), raising questions about their timing and underlying motivations as Canada approaches a pivotal federal election in 2025.
Canada's reputation as a destination for skilled immigrants and international students is under scrutiny. The Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) cut-off scores for Express Entry draws have increased, with recent draws requiring scores above 500 points—a threshold that excludes many applicants.
This shift has compelled more applicants to rely on employer-backed pathways requiring Labour Market Impact Assessments. However, recent changes have made LMIAs more burdensome for employers, introducing higher wage requirements, reinstating employer caps, limiting accepted documents for business verification.
Since Justin Trudeau's Liberal government took office in 2015, immigration policy has experienced significant shifts, influenced by changing ministers and evolving priorities:
- 2015-2017: John McCallum
- McCallum oversaw Canada's response to the Syrian refugee crisis, facilitating the resettlement of over 25,000 refugees within a year. During his tenure, 296,000 new permanent residents were landed in 2016, a notable increase from previous years.
- 2017-2019: Ahmed Hussen
- Hussen introduced the Global Skills Strategy, aimed at expediting work permits for high-demand occupations. This period also saw enhancements to Express Entry, including additional points for French-speaking candidates and those with siblings in Canada. Under his leadership, 341,000 immigrants were granted PR in 2019, a record at the time.
- 2019-2021: Marco Mendicino
- Mendicino's term was marked by ambitious immigration targets despite the COVID-19 pandemic. The government set a goal of welcoming over 400,000 new immigrants annually, achieving 405,000 landings in 2021—the highest number in Canadian history.
- 2021-Present: Sean Fraser and Marc Miller
- Fraser implemented targeted Express Entry draws, focusing on in-demand professions. Under Miller, however, the narrative has shifted toward tightening pathways. In 2023, 437,000 permanent residents were landed, but stricter measures in 2024 are raising concerns about future targets.
Justin Trudeau's administration initially presented a vision of inclusivity and accessibility in immigration, championing openness as a defining Canadian value. However, recent policy adjustments appear to diverge from this ethos. Higher barriers to PR, combined with more restrictive pathways for international students and skilled workers, suggest a shift toward a more selective system.
This evolution could be attributed to mounting public pressure over housing shortages, healthcare capacity, and labor market integration. A 2024 Angus Reid poll found that 52% of Canadians believe immigration levels are too high, compared to 39% in 2020.
With over 25% of Canada's population being foreign-born—the highest proportion since Confederation—immigration has become a focal point in political debates. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's administration has historically championed immigration, but recent shifts suggest a strategic pivot. Some analysts believe these changes are designed to address concerns among voters worried about job competition, housing affordability, and strain on public services.
Immigration remains critical to Canada's economic sustainability. Between 2016 and 2021, immigrants contributed 84% of labour force growth, according to Statistics Canada. By 2043, nearly one in four Canadians will be over 65, amplifying the need for younger, skilled workers to support the economy and public services.
International students, a key demographic for future PR applicants, generated $22 billion in economic activity in 2023, according to the Canadian Bureau for International Education. Yet, many of these students are finding the path to PR increasingly difficult. For example, higher CRS scores have left thousands in limbo, unable to secure permanent status despite years of study and work in Canada.
Canada has long been recognized as a global leader in immigration, promoting itself as a welcoming destination for international talent. However, recent policy shifts have introduced more restrictive measures, leading to a disparity between Canada's inclusive image and its current immigration practices.
In October 2024, the Canadian government announced a significant reduction in immigration targets. The planned admissions for new permanent residents were set at 395,000 for 2025, 380,000 for 2026, and 365,000 for 2027, marking a substantial decrease from the 485,000 planned for 2024.
International students have been particularly affected by these policy changes. Despite being considered ideal candidates for permanent residency due to their education, language proficiency, and integration into Canadian society, many face increased challenges in transitioning to permanent status. A study by Statistics Canada revealed that only about 30% of international students who entered Canada since 2000 became permanent residents within ten years of receiving their first study permit.
The reduction in immigration levels reflects a response to growing public concerns over issues such as housing affordability and labor market pressures. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged the need for controlled and sustainable immigration, admitting that previous policies may have failed to balance these factors effectively.
As Canada prepares for the 2025 federal election, immigration policy is poised to be a defining issue. While the Trudeau government’s recent changes may appeal to certain voter blocs, they risk undermining Canada’s reputation as a global leader in immigration. Policymakers must prioritize an immigration framework that balances public concerns with economic and demographic needs.
Any article or other information or content expressed or made available in this Section is that of the respective author(s) and not of the OBA.