Articles

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui

Top Five Privacy Developments in Canada: A Year in Review 2023

  • 16 janvier 2024
  • Roland Hung, Torkin Manes LLP

As another year has come to an end and we have already embarked on a new year, we take this opportunity to reflect on a number of significant changes to Canadian privacy law. From promising developments to proposed legislation to a groundbreaking investigation, there is much to review as we head into 2024. This article reviews the top five recent developments we encountered this year.

Droit de la protection de la vie privée, Student Forum
head-shot of author Sahil Shoor

Ontario OH&S Update – Supreme Court upholds ONCA decision in R v. Greater Sudbury (City)

  • 15 janvier 2024
  • Sahil Shoor, partner, Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP

On November 10, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a split decision in R v. Greater Sudbury (City). This precedent-setting decision significantly expands the health and safety obligations of an “Owner” under Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure, Student Forum
head-shot photos of authors Jay Nathwani and John Margie

Prompt Payment Gaps in the Construction Act

  • 15 janvier 2024
  • Jay Nathwani, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law, and John Margie, partner, Margie Strub Construction Law

Ontario’s prompt payment system under the Construction Act has changed the way that parties to construction projects understand their payment obligations. But there are several significant gaps in the prompt payment scheme that produce significant uncertainty and risk for contractors. In this article, we discuss three such gaps.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure, Student Forum
head-shot photo of author Paul Ivanoff

Adjudication: Ontario Decision a Reminder that “Rough Justice” is Not Real Justice

  • 15 janvier 2024
  • Paul Ivanoff, partner, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

With the introduction of prompt payment and adjudication into Ontario’s Construction Act, the pursuit of “rough justice” became a new tool in the tool-kit of project participants. In spite of its procedural and other frailties, adjudication arrived along with a legislated provision that “the determination and reasons of an adjudicator are admissible as evidence in a court.” The addition of this “admissibility” provision raises interesting questions.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure, Student Forum
head-shot photos of authors Catherine Gleason-Mercier, Nicholas Reynolds and Rachel Poon

I Take it Back – Praxy Cladding Corp. v. Stone Lamina Inc. and the Withdrawal of Admissions from Pleadings and Examinations for Discovery

  • 15 janvier 2024
  • Catherine Gleason-Mercier, partner, Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP; Nicholas Reynolds, associate, Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP; and Rachel Poon, associate, Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP

In Praxy Cladding Corp. v. Stone Lamina Inc., the Ontario Superior Court reviewed the process for amending pleadings in proceedings under the Construction Act, and in doing so, provided important clarity as to what constitutes an admission, as well as the distinction between an admission from a pleading versus an admission arising out of an examination for discovery. The authors consider the key takeaways from this decision with respect to pleadings and conducting examinations for discovery.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure, Student Forum

What’s New in Pension and Benefits – Winter 2024

  • 09 janvier 2024
  • Michelle Rival and Evan Shapiro, WTW and Leslie Steeves, Mercer

Recent updates in Ontario and Federal pension legislation, regulatory policy, caselaw and taxation.

Droit des régimes de retraite et des avantages sociaux, Student Forum

December 2023 Case Law Summaries

  • 09 janvier 2024
  • Johann Annisette

On December 20th, 2023, Anna Lei and Hanna Rioseco of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP presented at the OBA Health Law Section – Case Law Update, summarizing recent important cases in the area. Both Anna and Hanna provided key takeaways from the three cases presented, which will be important to keep in mind for healthcare providers, individuals, and lawyers practicing within the field.

Droit relatif à la santé, Student Forum

Bautista v. the King, 2022-2718(IT)G

  • 09 janvier 2024
  • Sarah Spaner

In June, the National Post publicized a tax appeal by Toronto sports icon José Bautista. Because the appeal deals with how non-resident, high-income earners save for retirement and protect their income from Canadian taxes, commentators have speculated that a dismissal by the TCC could eliminate certain financial enticements for athletes to play in Canada. This article summarizes the facts and tax issues at stake in this appeal.

Student Forum, Droit fiscal

The King v. MMV Capital Partners Inc. — Federal Court of Appeal Applies the GAAR to a Series of Loss Utilization Transactions

  • 09 janvier 2024
  • Marta Porodko and Lisa Watzinger

In The King v. MMV Capital Partners Inc., the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) found that the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR), section 245 of the Income Tax Act (Act), applied to a series of loss utilization transactions. According to the FCA, the transactions were structured to allow a third-party purchaser to access the taxpayer’s losses, and the GAAR applied because the transactions frustrated the object, spirit, and purpose of the loss restriction rules in subsection 111(5) of the Act.

Student Forum, Droit fiscal