Articles 2024

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui

Can the Government be ‘Cruel’ to a Corporation?

  • 02 mars 2020
  • Ravi Amarnath

Can a corporation challenge a mandatory minimum fine on the basis that it infringes s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? This is the question the Supreme Court of Canada will address in Attorney General of Quebec, et al. v. 9147-0732 Québec Inc., which was argued before the Supreme Court in January 2020 and is currently under reserve.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum

Blaney's Appeals: Court of Appeal Summaries (February 10 – 14, 2020)

  • 25 février 2020
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Following are this week’s summaries of the civil decisions. Ingarra v. 3010999 Ontario Limited (Previn Court Homes) is a reminder to residential real estate lawyers that their clients purchasing new homes have added rights under the Tarion legislation regarding extensions of the closing date. In Zhao v. Li, the Court of Appeal distinguished between singular and ongoing acts of oppression. Other topics included a large fraud against a foreign pension fund.

Litige civil, Student Forum

Second Round Knockout: Security for Costs and the New Construction Act

  • 25 février 2020
  • Ivan Merrow, Glaholt Bowles LLP

Ontario’s reformed Construction Act has been fully in force since October 1, 2019. The changes to the Act and its regulations are still settling across the province, at times in surprising ways. In the Ontario Superior Court’s recent decision, The Gatti Group Corp v. Zuccarini, 2019 ONSC 7050 (“Zuccarini”), the Act amplified the defendants’ successful second security for costs motion, resulting in an order that the plaintiff post $95,000 into court in 30 days.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure, Student Forum

Lessons from Norcon: Private Receivers as an Adequate Alternative Avenue of Relief to Court-Appointed Receivers

  • 25 février 2020
  • Puya Fesharaki and Stephanie Sonawane, Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP

The recent decision in Norcon Marine Services Ltd., (Re), 2019 NLSC 238 (“Norcon”) may have important implications beyond Newfoundland and Labrador. In Norcon, the Court denied an application for a Court-appointed receivership on the basis that the applicant did not demonstrate that a Court-supervised process was “necessary”. In so deciding, among other reasons, the Court put an emphasis on the availability of a private receivership as an adequate alternative avenue of relief.

Droit de l’insolvabilité, Student Forum

Federal Court of Appeal Settles the Protective Order Debate

  • 24 février 2020
  • Jahdiel Larraguibel, Fineberg Ramamoorthy LLP

Federal Court of Appeal reinstates the legitimacy of protective orders in complex intellectual property disputes.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

The Use of Blockchain to Bolster Copyright Protection in Canada

  • 24 février 2020
  • Michelle Noonan and Hashim Ghazi, Deeth Williams Wall LLP

How Imprimo – a public blockchain registry – will improve Canadian copyright protection for visual artists.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle