Articles

About ArticlesLes articles ci-dessous sont publiés par la Section du droit des assurances de l'Association du Barreau de l'Ontario. Les membres sont invités à soumettre des articles.  A propos des articles.

Rédacteurs : Matthew Gardner and Annette Casullo

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui
Ethics and Civility in the Courtroom and Beyond

Ethics and Civility in the Courtroom and Beyond

  • 30 janvier 2017
  • Jessa Marie Conmigo and Silvio Vallati

This article discusses the OBA's CPD program on Ethics and Civility featuring speakers Joseph Groia, W.A. Derry Millar, Justice Michael Tulloch, Prof. Constance Backhouse, Prof. David Lepofsky, William S. Chalmer, Alfred Kwinter, and Ian Hu. The speakers tackled contentious issues on civility and professionalism facing litigators.

Droit des assurances
The Decision in <em>Anjum v. Doe</em>: What summary judgment motions may look like post <em>Hryniak</em>

The Decision in Anjum v. Doe: What summary judgment motions may look like post Hryniak

  • 30 janvier 2017
  • Jim Davidson

Since the Supreme Court decision in Hryniak v Maulden, a number of summary judgment motions have come before the courts. However, the recent decision in Anjum v Doe (2016 ONSC 7784) is one of the few decisions that truly follows the Hryniak process as envisioned by Justice Karakatsanis in her ground breaking decision. Jim discusses whether the Anjum decision fulfilled the Hryniak promise to alleviate protracted cost and delay associated with civil trials in Canada.

Droit des assurances
The Election Requirement When NEB and IRB are at Issue

The Election Requirement When NEB and IRB are at Issue

  • 03 novembre 2016
  • Shane H. Katz

This particular LAT decision suggests that if applicants do not medically qualify for an IRB, they can still apply for NEB, if not given the option to elect, thus requiring insurers to send out election forms for every claim where IRB may be payable to preclude applicants from claiming both NEB and IRB.

Droit des assurances
<em>Lexfund v Ferro et al</em>: Litigation lender found in breach of Consumer Protection Act; recovers simple interest at reduced rate instead of compound interest

Lexfund v Ferro et al: Litigation lender found in breach of Consumer Protection Act; recovers simple interest at reduced rate instead of compound interest

  • 18 octobre 2016
  • Bevin Shores

Counsel who act in matters that may be funded by litigation loans will want to be aware of the June 22, 2016 decision of Justice Sloan in this case, in which a litigation lender was found to have breached the Consumer Protection Act, and accordingly was only permitted to recover 5% per annum simple interest, as opposed to the 19.5% to 24% interest compounded monthly that had been set forth in the lending agreements.

Droit des assurances
Message from the 2015-2016 Chair

Message from the 2015-2016 Chair

  • 19 juillet 2016
  • Audrey P. Ramsay

Another successful term for the Insurance Law Section draws to a close, and we welcome our incoming chair, Amanda McBride.

Droit des assurances
Emerging Experts in Environmental and Weather Related Claims

Emerging Experts in Environmental and Weather Related Claims

  • 24 juin 2016
  • Amanda McBride and Daniel Michaud-Shields

Weather Attribution is a broad term encapsulating many scientific disciplines that seek to ultimately link climate change to specific weather events. As a scientific field, it is rarely seen within litigation matters, but it has manifested itself in the insurance industry, as insurers have found utility in this science for several years now, when dealing with issues related to weather events.

Droit des assurances
Disclosure Requirements for Statutory Third Parties

Disclosure Requirements for Statutory Third Parties

  • 24 juin 2016
  • Randall Carter

Two cases decided within the last year have confirmed that an insurer that adds itself as a Third Party pursuant to Section 258 (14) of the Insurance Act (the off-coverage insurer) is required to answer questions and disclose information in relation to the insurer’s off-coverage position.

Droit des assurances