Articles 2024

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui

Insurance Policy Covers Defence Costs Incurred for Directors and Officers in Security Regulators’ Investigation

  • 27 octobre 2017
  • Nina Bombier, with the assistance of Graham Henry

As regulatory investigations and litigation against corporate directors and officers become increasingly complex and extensive, insurance policies covering defence costs are all the more important. But how far does this coverage stretch? The recent decision of Liberty Silver v Liberty Insurance demonstrates the significant value these policies can provide in covering an early and proactive legal defence.

Droit des assurances, Student Forum

OBA Excellence in Insurance Law Award Acceptance Speech

  • 23 octobre 2017
  • Don Rogers Q.C. is a founding partner and now acts as Counsel to Rogers Partners LLP. Don is one of the most experienced trial counsel in the province, and has argued cases at all levels of trial and appellate courts in Canada and before numerous administrative tribunals. He is this year's recipient of the OBA's Excellence in Insurance Law.

On June 21, 2017 the OBA Award of Excellence in Insurance Law was proudly presented to Donald H. Rogers of Rogers Partners LPP at the Toronto Eaton Centre Marriott celebrating Donald’s contributions to the profession. This is the transcript of his acceptance speech.

Droit des assurances, Student Forum

Don Rogers, Upon Winning the OBA Award of Excellence in Insurance Law

  • 04 juillet 2017

"As this year’s representative of the insurance bar, and someone who has been at it for quite a long time, I would like to reflect briefly on some of the many good things that flow from our membership in this exclusive club – the insurance bar."

Droit des assurances
The Low-Down on PIPEDA Requests in Personal Injury Cases

The Low-Down on PIPEDA Requests in Personal Injury Cases

  • 11 mai 2017
  • R. Lee Akazaki

Seemingly out of nowhere, institutional litigants, insurers and the third-party vendors they retain to support their obligations in responding to claims have been inundated with requests for disclosure on pain of complaints or actions to collect damages under PIPEDA. In some instances, parties directly approach non-parties such as medical experts and private investigation companies and demand production of documents separately from any disclosure procedures in the claims or law suits.

Droit des assurances
Deducting Sick Days in Personal Injury Claims

Deducting Sick Days in Personal Injury Claims

  • 30 janvier 2017
  • Christopher Martyr

The deductibility of the value of sick days is a question that many lawyers have to confront in various personal injury matters. While some counsel believe sick days are deductible, others believe that it depends on the type of loss. This article discusses the varied arguments and law surrounding the deductibility of sick days.

Droit des assurances
Ethics and Civility in the Courtroom and Beyond

Ethics and Civility in the Courtroom and Beyond

  • 30 janvier 2017
  • Jessa Marie Conmigo and Silvio Vallati

This article discusses the OBA's CPD program on Ethics and Civility featuring speakers Joseph Groia, W.A. Derry Millar, Justice Michael Tulloch, Prof. Constance Backhouse, Prof. David Lepofsky, William S. Chalmer, Alfred Kwinter, and Ian Hu. The speakers tackled contentious issues on civility and professionalism facing litigators.

Droit des assurances
The Decision in <em>Anjum v. Doe</em>: What summary judgment motions may look like post <em>Hryniak</em>

The Decision in Anjum v. Doe: What summary judgment motions may look like post Hryniak

  • 30 janvier 2017
  • Jim Davidson

Since the Supreme Court decision in Hryniak v Maulden, a number of summary judgment motions have come before the courts. However, the recent decision in Anjum v Doe (2016 ONSC 7784) is one of the few decisions that truly follows the Hryniak process as envisioned by Justice Karakatsanis in her ground breaking decision. Jim discusses whether the Anjum decision fulfilled the Hryniak promise to alleviate protracted cost and delay associated with civil trials in Canada.

Droit des assurances
The Election Requirement When NEB and IRB are at Issue

The Election Requirement When NEB and IRB are at Issue

  • 03 novembre 2016
  • Shane H. Katz

This particular LAT decision suggests that if applicants do not medically qualify for an IRB, they can still apply for NEB, if not given the option to elect, thus requiring insurers to send out election forms for every claim where IRB may be payable to preclude applicants from claiming both NEB and IRB.

Droit des assurances
<em>Lexfund v Ferro et al</em>: Litigation lender found in breach of Consumer Protection Act; recovers simple interest at reduced rate instead of compound interest

Lexfund v Ferro et al: Litigation lender found in breach of Consumer Protection Act; recovers simple interest at reduced rate instead of compound interest

  • 18 octobre 2016
  • Bevin Shores

Counsel who act in matters that may be funded by litigation loans will want to be aware of the June 22, 2016 decision of Justice Sloan in this case, in which a litigation lender was found to have breached the Consumer Protection Act, and accordingly was only permitted to recover 5% per annum simple interest, as opposed to the 19.5% to 24% interest compounded monthly that had been set forth in the lending agreements.

Droit des assurances