Articles 2019

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui

ChatGPT: The Hottest Toy of 2023

  • 02 mai 2023
  • Jennifer R Davidson, partner, Deeth Williams Wall LLP, and Sharan Johal, articling student, Deeth Williams Wall LLP

ChatGPT, developed by Microsoft-backed research lab OpenAI, has occupied the artificial intelligence news stream since its initial launch in December 2022. ChatGPT is a natural language processing generative AI tool that, depending on the model a user can access, can generate text-to-text, or image-to-text, output in a formula which mimics human conversation. The first publicly available tool of its kind, ChatGPT has become one of the fastest-growing consumer applications of all time.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Marketing in the Metaverse Facing Regulatory Limbo

  • 25 février 2023
  • Daniel Daniele, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada

The metaverse is an elusive concept, but can be broadly described as a rapidly growing extension of the tendrils of the internet, redefining what constitutes social media. As an ever growing and immersive network of technologies, the metaverse attempts to close the gap between society and the media which serves as its vehicle. As it exists now, the metaverse is a multi-platform virtual ecosystem with an integrated economy that evolves and grows in real time.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Puma’s “procat” Likely to be Confusing with Caterpillar’s CAT & Triangle Design

  • 25 février 2023
  • Jose Garcia-Bonilla

In Puma SE v. Caterpillar Inc., 2023 FCA 4, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) declined to set aside the Federal Court’s decision to refuse Puma SE’s (“Puma”) application to register its trademark “procat”. The FCA held that Puma failed to demonstrate any palpable or overriding error in the Federal Court’s analysis that “procat” would be confusing with Caterpillar Inc.’s (“Caterpillar”) CAT & Triangle Design Mark (the “Design Mark”) for use in association with athletic footwear and headgear.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Drawing the Line: Thom Browne Prevails in Parallel Stripe Case against Adidas

  • 25 février 2023
  • Alessia Monastero, associate and trademark agent at Bhole IP Law

On January 13, 2023, a final judgment was issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in adidas America, Inc., et. al., v. Thom Browne, Inc., 1:21-cv-05615. The defendant, Thom Browne Inc. (Thom Browne), was found not liable for trademark infringement and trademark dilution as brought by the plaintiffs, adidas America Inc. and adidas AG (Adidas). Adidas has since filed a notice of appeal.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle
photo of authors Sally Yoon and Imtiaz Karamat

Legal Tug-of-War: Protecting Privilege in Privacy Breach Disputes

  • 25 février 2023
  • Sally Yoon, student, Osgoode Hall Law School; M. Imtiaz Karamat, associate, Deeth Williams Wall LLP

Privacy breaches are becoming commonplace in today’s business landscape and cybersecurity is top of mind for many organizations - and for good reason. The 2022 Canadian Internet Registry Authority (CIRA) Cybersecurity Survey found that the number of breaches involving customer and employee information nearly doubled after the pandemic, and more businesses are reporting loss of customers from cyberattacks.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Five Tips for Working with Self-Represented Litigants in IP Matters

  • 25 février 2023
  • Kaitlin Soye

For a variety of reasons, litigants in Federal Court may choose to proceed with their action without legal representation. While it may be more common in provincial courts, self-representative litigants are involved in proceedings in Federal Courts, including intellectual property matters. Self-represented litigants and non-lawyer representatives may pose a challenge for lawyers and their clients, as well as the judicial system in general.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Personality Rights of Dead Celebrities in Canada and Who Owns Them?

  • 13 février 2023
  • Govind K Chaturvedi

Personality rights of deceased celebrities have been the subject of debate for many years due to the continued popularity of these individuals beyond their death. Recently, two events have sparked renewed discussions on the matter. These events raise ethical and legal issues related to publicity, privacy, and intellectual property. This article will explore these issues through the lens of prior case law.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Gucci’s Loss is Parodys’ Gain: CUGGL found not similar to GUCCI

  • 07 novembre 2022
  • Pankhuri Malik, Osgoode LLM graduate, IPilogue writer and IP Innovation Clinic Fellow

Last month, Gucci found itself on the losing side of a trademark battle in Japan. The Italian luxury goods company had been in an ongoing dispute with the brand Parodys, owned by Nobuaki Korukawa. Kurokawa makes t-shirts with parodies of famous brands like Chanel, Balenciaga, Adidas and of course, Gucci.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Deepfakes: Whose Personality is it Anyway?

  • 07 novembre 2022
  • Christopher Tsuji

Hollywood-esque special effects that allow anyone to become any person with the click of a few buttons: this is the reality of deepfakes. Deepfakes are a form of technology that uses artificial intelligence (“AI”) to allow a person to impersonate someone else’s appearance and voice. A person only needs a phone or a computer, and an image or video of the desired target.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle

Assessing Patentable Subject Matter: A (Potential) New Framework

  • 07 novembre 2022
  • Steffi Tran, Deeth Williams Wall LLP

In recent years, the CIPO has received criticism for its approach in claim construction, particularly in the context of assessing the patentability of computer-implemented inventions. It has been especially difficult for patent applications involving computer-implemented inventions to overcome CIPO’s “problem-solution” approach, as CIPO examiners have generally deemed computer elements as non-essential, often resulting in the rejection of such inventions on grounds of ineligible subject matter.

Student Forum, Technologies de l'information et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle