Stay informed with the latest insights and updates

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has dominated the news and is frequently used as an umbrella term encompassing a wide array of technologies, many of which predate modern AI. In its true sense, AI refers to systems that are designed to mimic human intelligence, including learning, comprehension and problem solving. However, not all technologies currently being promoted under the AI designation meet this definition. While AI is expected to have sweeping and transformative effects across numerous professions, including the legal sector - it is important to remember that all types of technologies can create opportunities and risks. Within this context, in-house counsel are increasingly adopting new technological solutions to streamline their workflows and enhance efficiency to add value to their organizations. From contract management to governance, incorporating technology into daily practice is reshaping how in-house legal teams operate within the business. This article highlights several practical ways in-house counsel can leverage technologies apart from AI to optimize their functions.

To open this newsletter season, we are delighted to feature an inspiring conversation with Jay Rudolph, the recipient of the 2025 OBA  Award of Excellence in ADR. Jay’s work and reputation in the field of mediation have long earned him the respect of colleagues, clients, and peers across the profession. I had the honour of sitting down with Jay to talk about his practice, his aspirations, and moments of reflection that reveal both nostalgia and gratitude. Our discussion offered a window into the thoughtful and grounded approach that has defined his career and the deep sense of purpose that continues to guide his work.

The Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Ontario (Transportation) v. J & P Leveque Bros. Haulage Ltd., 2025 ONCA 573, provides critical guidance on the interpretation of dispute resolution provisions in standard form government construction contracts and the limitation periods pertaining to same.

This article explores including tolling agreements directly within one’s construction contract, obviating the need to commence an action prematurely to avoid losing their claim due to the Limitations Act.

When schedule delays impact important contract milestones beyond key deadlines, a recovery schedule may be the only chance a project has to achieve those milestones. This article explores lessons learned from two projects that were significantly delayed and used recovery schedules to achieve project success, and discusses guidelines from the AACE Recommended Practice 54R-07, “Recovery Scheduling – As Applied in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction.”

On May 28, 2025, a precedent-setting order was issued in a Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) proceeding preventing calls on performance bonds by obligees unless the written consent of the insolvent companies and monitor is obtained, or leave is granted by a commercial court judge.

The question at the heart of this article is whether the appropriate standard of care in negligence related to the maintenance and use of police databases by law enforcement and other related agencies should be interpreted in light of the Charter value of equality. In the authors’ view, the standard of care in negligence cases against law enforcement has been a relatively low bar and has been informed by law enforcement policies. The authors take the position this is true of cases involving police databases as well. Recently, the Supreme Court of Canada and the Ontario Court of Appeal have recognized that the over-policing of minorities violates the equality guarantees in s. 15 of the Charter. In the authors’ view, the data stored in police databases reflects the reality of this discriminatory over-policing. Put differently, the authors take the position that over-policing results in the over-representation of racial minorities in police databases. Given the underlying constitutional violations associated with over-policing, it is the authors’ position that cases involving the negligent maintenance or use of such databases engage the Charter value of equality. Charter rights are conceptually distinct from Charter values, but Charter values nevertheless underpin each Charter right and give it meaning. Charter values can apply even where a Charter right is not engaged. Tort law has long been developed in light of Charter values. In the authors’ view, the tort of negligence should be similarly developed. Specifically, when formulating and applying the standard of care in relation to the maintenance and use of police databases, courts should appropriately scrutinize existing policies and procedures, including any discriminatory impact of seemingly neutral policies.

Every four years marks a new provincial election cycle in Ontario. Each cycle, registered political parties are forced to contend with how, and through what mediums, they will drive Ontarians to the polls and communicate their political messaging. These considerations are increasingly important as advertisement media shifts and Ontarians’ central concerns evolve from cycle to cycle. This is not a concern for registered political parties alone, however. Third parties are also engaged in political advertising, albeit the extent of that advertisement during the 12 months before a provincial election writ period differs than that for registered political parties. In Ontario (Attorney General) v. Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc., 2025 SCC 5 (“Working Families”), the Supreme Court of Canada explored the constitutionality of this differentiation.

This is your occasional dip into what child rights researchers and advocates have been up to of late. You’ll also want to read on for some helpful links as you get ready for National Child Day on November 20.

Your Child and Youth Law Section executive committee has put together three(!) upcoming events for anyone whose practice intersects with the rights and interests of children.

Each year, many of the Ontario Bar Association’s sections recognize those members who have made exceptional contributions to their areas of practice. This year, two longtime contributors to the Child and Youth Law Section are being recognized by their colleagues for their various accomplishments.

A significant legislative shift is underway in both Ottawa and Queen’s Park, one that should command the attention of lawyers in environmental, Indigenous, and administrative law. Federal Bill C-5 and Ontario’s Bill 5 are united by a common objective to accelerate major projects in the name of national and provincial prosperity. However, the legal mechanisms they employ to achieve this speed are prompting serious questions about constitutional duties, procedural fairness, and the future of regulatory certainty.

How do we, as lawyers, guide our clients through CAS involvement? Arguably, the answer lies in striking a careful balance: cooperating with the Society while maintaining strategic advocacy in our client’s best interests. It means helping the client engage meaningfully with CAS, without exposing themselves to unnecessary risk, self-incrimination, or the erosion of their legal rights.

The article discusses the growing need for accessible intellectual property (IP) legal support in Ontario, especially for small businesses, startups, and early-stage entrepreneurs who face financial and informational barriers to protecting their ideas. Despite Ontario’s status as a thriving innovation hub, current legal resources—especially in IP—are insufficient to meet the demand. To address this gap, university-based pro bono IP clinics are emerging as a key solution. The article focuses on the Western Intellectual Property and Innovation Legal Clinic (WIPILC) at Western University’s Faculty of Law, led by Dr. Bassem Awad. Founded in 2021, the Clinic helps innovators across Southwestern Ontario understand and protect their IP while offering law students practical, hands-on legal training.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of October 13, 2025.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of October 6, 2025.

October 1, 2025 marked the 40th anniversary of the WSIAT, the Office of the Employer Adviser, and the Office of the Worker Adviser. This article traces their shared origins in the 1980 Weiler Report and the sweeping reforms that shaped Ontario’s modern workers’ compensation system.

In 2026 the Civil Rules Review Working Group (CRRWG) is looking to bring changes which include the elimination of Examinations for Discovery and replacing it with an early disclosure of all affidavits from all anticipated trial witnesses and documentation to be used at trial. Among the proposed reforms, the elimination of discoveries is by far the most discussed and striking proposal for litigators. Without oral testimony prior to trial, lawyers lose the critical opportunity to assess a plaintiff’s credibility and identify inconsistencies in their affidavits or documents. With trial being the first time evidence is heard, both parties may face unexpected developments, making it harder to anticipate and counter arguments. The elimination of discovery also removes the ability to request undertakings for key documents. Under the proposed 'documentary disclosure', there’s concern that parties may withhold materials that could support the opposing case. Without the mechanism of undertakings, obtaining crucial evidence may become significantly more challenging.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of September 29, 2025

For Aboriginal law practitioners in Ontario, navigating the fiscal landscape for First Nations clients often begins and ends with section 87 of the Indian Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5. While crucial, its exemptions are limited and focused more on reserve. The real story of modern First Nations governance, however, is being written through the exercise of inherent tax authority. This shift from tax exemption to tax jurisdiction is a powerful tool for self-determination, and lawyers must be equipped to guide their clients through the evolving frameworks available.

Is municipal parkland immune from claims of adverse possession, and what role does the common law have in claims of adverse possession? In Kosicki v Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28 (Kosicki), the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) answered these questions in a decision that likely has broader implications on the application of statutory law in Canada.

This Article examines Barrie & District Association of Realtors v. Information Technology Systems Ontario (2025 ONSC 3388), where the Ontario Superior Court upheld a not-for-profit’s authority to amend membership rules under the ONCA. The court dismissed BDAR’s challenge to ITSO’s by-law changes, finding they were valid, clear, and made in good faith to preserve ITSO’s independence. Justice Mathai emphasized judicial deference to internal governance decisions absent bad faith or procedural unfairness. The decision affirms that not-for-profits may adapt their governance structures to evolving needs, particularly in competitive, networked sectors like MLS systems, so long as changes are procedurally sound and aligned with corporate purpose.

In July 2025, the Federal Court of Canada certified a drip pricing class action for the first time but declined to certify the plaintiff’s double ticketing claim. In Deane v. Canada Post Corporation, 2025 FC 1194, the Federal Court provides important guidance on the drip pricing framework under the Competition Act and clarified the difference between drip pricing and double ticketing.

For over a decade courts have grappled with the question of what amounts to a ‘public correction’ for a Part XXIII.1 secondary market securities misrepresentation claim under the Securities Act. One issue that has repeatedly arisen but has not been resolved is whether there can be a ‘partial public correction’ of a misrepresentation.

In Carcillo, the Court of Appeal for Ontario engages in a careful review of the law concerning class actions grounded in claims of systemic negligence and institutional abuse, and underscores the importance of a detailed litigation plan at certification.

Sellars v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 FC 1477 provides guidance on when the deferral of statements of defence may be appropriate in a proposed class action brought before the Federal Court.

Free for OBA members, the OBA AI Academy offers self-paced modules, a secure practice space, and LawQi, an AI guide built for lawyers. After completing the lessons, I stress-tested LawQi on dense tax provisions like EIFEL and thin cap. The Academy also blends learning with a dash of fun, thanks to a points system and a leaderboard for bragging rights.

This article examines the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada v. Vefghi Holding Corporation, 2025 FCA 143 which provides the answer to a longstanding technical question, namely, the point in time governing the determination of “connected status” in respect of dividends received by a corporate beneficiary and payor corporation in a “trust sandwich” structure.

Ten tips for lawyers to keep in mind when preparing an estate plan in order to avoid litigation, tax burdens, and family conflict.