Family law lawyers know this scene all too well. A client, already worn down by the strain of a separation, a custody battle, or the lingering impact of intimate partner violence, gets a call from the Children’s Aid Society (CAS). In an instant, everything shifts – the stakes rise, deadlines tighten, the scrutiny deepens, and the tension in the room thickens.
For the lawyer, it’s a familiar turning point. What began as a family dispute rooted in heartbreak and logistics now carries the weight of child protection concerns. Every word, every decision, every piece of advice suddenly matters even more. The client looks to their lawyer not just for legal guidance, but for steadiness, someone who can help them breathe through the panic while navigating a system that feels both overwhelming and unforgiving.
So how do we, as lawyers, guide our clients through CAS involvement? Arguably, the answer lies in striking a careful balance: cooperating with the Society while maintaining strategic advocacy in our client’s best interests. It means helping the client engage meaningfully with CAS, without exposing themselves to unnecessary risk, self-incrimination, or the erosion of their legal rights.
CAS 101: Core Principles Lawyers Must Keep in Mind
CAS involvement is not optional. Under the Child, Youth and Family Services Act (CYFSA), workers have a statutory duty to investigate whenever they receive information suggesting that a child may be in need of protection. Their mandate is child-focused: the best interests, safety, and well-being of the child remain paramount in every investigation.
CAS involvement can be supportive, investigative, adversarial or any combination of the three. In some cases, it takes the form of referrals to community programs or parenting supports. In others, it escalates quickly into urgent protection investigations, court filings, police involvement, or even out-of-home placements.
Parents may encounter multiple workers across different departments: intake screeners, assessment workers, family service workers, kinship and foster care staff, and adoption personnel. Each of these professionals has a duty to document their involvement. Those records, if the matter proceeds to litigation, often become central pieces of evidence with the workers themselves called as key witnesses to describe their interactions and conversations with your client.
The Referral Moment: How it Starts
For lawyers, what a client does at the moment of a CAS referral can be critical to how the case unfolds. Consider this scenario: a teacher contacts CAS after a student discloses that she has been self-harming. During the disclosure, the child explains that she has witnessed her father, while under the influence of alcohol, hitting her mother during an argument. In this situation, the teacher has a statutory duty under the legislation to report her concerns to the Society, and she does.
Once a case has been referred to the agency, the screening process begins. The agency codes the conflict under the Eligibility Spectrum as one or more of the following: the caregiver’s behavior is creating a risk of harm; emotional harm or exposure to adult conflict; and/or failure of a caregiver to protect the child. From that moment, timelines begin to run. In accordance with the legislation and Child Protection Standards, the worker must meet with the child and assess the level of risk within a timeframe that ranges from 12 hours to 7 days, depending on the degree of risk identified. The investigation will be completed within 30 days unless a departure from the Standards is approved by the worker’s supervisor. The Standards require that the child and both parents be interviewed, giving each an opportunity to share their account of the events that triggered the report.
Clients who decline to speak with CAS or refuse to participate in the mandated investigation risk having their perspective excluded from the safety assessment. This often leads to recommendations for supervised access for the parent facing allegations of intimate partner violence. While judges may understand a parent’s reluctance, non-cooperation almost always results in more intrusive CAS involvement and stricter court orders. Counsel must carefully weigh these risks and generally advise clients to participate in a controlled, proactive manner whenever possible.
What Keeps CAS Awake at Night in Intimate Partner Violence Cases
In cases involving intimate partner violence, CAS concerns are clinical and child focused. They include:
- The impact of exposure to violence on children, including potential estrangement from one parent when children are caught in the conflict.
- The protective capacity of the non-offending parent to plan for the safety of themselves and the children.
- The ongoing presence of the abusive partner, whether in the home or maintaining access to the children.
- The intersection of additional risk factors, such as mental health challenges, addictions, or housing insecurity, which may further affect the family and the children.
- The candor of each parent, with adverse inferences most often drawn when parents are not forthcoming about the situation that prompted the initial complaint and the safety concerns identified by the worker.
Cooperation with Counsel and CAS: Strategic, Not Blind
Lawyers can play a crucial role by helping their clients demonstrate protective steps, such as attending counseling, engaging in safety planning, participating in substance use treatment, and connecting with community supports. CAS will consider this demonstrated protective capacity in its risk analysis and will likely report to the court on the client’s willingness and ability to work cooperatively with the Society.
One of the thorniest issues arises when criminal charges proceed concurrently with child protection involvement. Clients are understandably hesitant to speak with CAS out of fear of self-incrimination. However, consulting with counsel is critical, as outright refusal to cooperate can delay safety assessments and trigger more intrusive agency responses.
If parents do not provide their version of the events that led to the complaint, often because of concerns about self-incrimination in relation to criminal charges for spousal or child assault, the court will likely have only one version of events to consider. Counsel should not be surprised if the court relies on this single account when crafting a safety plan or issuing an interim order.
If parents choose to provide an affidavit or testify, whether in the criminal or child protection case, they will be subject to cross-examination on their account of intimate partner violence or assault, regardless of whether any criminal charges remain outstanding. Similarly, if a parent alleges that they are a victim of intimate partner violence, their testimony in criminal court can be scrutinized during family court proceedings, and vice versa.
Coordination between criminal and family counsel is crucial when criminal charges are outstanding. In some cases, counsel may attend a CAS interview jointly and negotiate the scope of questioning to minimize the risk of self-incrimination during the investigatory stage. It is important to note that if a parent decides to testify in either a criminal or child protection proceeding, their lawyer cannot control or limit the scope of the questioning. The rules of evidence govern what can be asked, and those rules do not allow such limits.
Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that the court has a complete and accurate picture of events while protecting the client’s legal rights. This means guiding clients to participate in the investigation in a controlled, strategic way, providing information that demonstrates protective steps without exposing themselves unnecessarily to risk. With careful planning, counsel can help their clients navigate CAS involvement, manage the timing and content of disclosures, and maintain credibility with both the agency and the court.
Counsel for the parent plays a critical role in pre-arranging disclosure parameters with the agency and discussing the situation with agency counsel. Strategic cooperation allows clients to protect their rights while enabling the agency to assess safety planning as fully as possible under the circumstances. When parents, counsel, and CAS collaborate effectively, the child’s interests are better protected, and the court receives more complete and reliable information.
Serious Criminal Charges: Heightened Risks
When serious criminal charges are at play, the stakes escalate sharply. Counsel must remind clients that:
- Nothing is off the record. Every statement to CAS workers is documented and may later surface in court, either through an affidavit or viva voce evidence.
- Self-incriminating disclosures can be compelled in family court. If a client refuses to answer questions or testify, adverse inferences may be drawn.
- The Crown may seek production of CAS notes where they are relevant to the criminal proceedings.
- CAS has a statutory duty to report offences to police.
- Silence carries its own risks. If a parent remains silent, the agency may draw adverse conclusions about risk, and family courts may also draw negative inferences where no explanation is provided in circumstances that clearly call for one.
- Family court operates under a different lens. Unlike criminal court, there is no presumption of innocence. The analysis is risk-based, focused on whether the child is safe, whether caregivers can protect, and what orders are necessary to serve the child’s best interests.
For these reasons, coordination between criminal and family counsel is not merely good practice, it is essential.
Survival Tips for Clients and Their Lawyers
When CAS is involved, your guidance can make a significant difference in the outcome.
Counsel should advise clients to:
- Remember that everything is recorded. Every statement, conversation, and interaction with CAS is documented in case notes.
- Be honest. Credibility is often determinative in outcomes, so honesty is critical.
- Pause and consult counsel before reacting. Take time to think before responding to inquiries or requests.
- Keep detailed personal records. Document all calls, meetings, and correspondence with CAS.
- Seek clarity. When concerns are vaguely described by the worker, ask for specific explanations to understand exactly what the issue is.
- Never coach children. CAS routinely conducts private interviews, and coached responses are usually apparent. This can undermine both credibility and trust with the agency.
- Request accommodations when needed. Language, literacy, or disability issues should be addressed proactively to ensure the client can fully participate.
- Ask for disclosure regularly. Counsel and clients should monitor notes and documents to understand the agency’s evidence and position throughout the process.
The Bottom Line
CAS involvement is rarely brief, but it is not indeterminate. In intimate partner violence cases, the best outcomes are achieved when each party stays in their own lane while working toward a common purpose. CAS remains focused on child safety, counsel ensures that the client’s rights are protected, and parents take steps to address identified risks, together creating a process that is both effective and accountable.
If your client leaves the process feeling empowered, heard, and supported, while also demonstrating protective measures for their children, you have fulfilled your role as counsel. In doing so, you may have helped tilt the balance toward a safer, healthier, and more stable future for both the family and the children.
Any article or other information or content expressed or made available in this Section is that of the respective author(s) and not of the OBA.