Articles 2025

This year's annual What You Missed While You Were Away program was organized and chaired by Lisa Watzinger and Hennadiy Kutsenko with presenters Joan Jung, Lesley L’Heureux, and Christopher Anderson.

Potential ACB increase as a result of a spin-off transaction is viewed by the CRA as subject to GAAR.

Eight commodity tax considerations for commercial landlords in Ontario.

In a recent decision of the Saskatchewan QB, the Court refused to certify an action and struck the claim in its entirety. The Court took issue with the behaviour of Plaintiffs’ counsel, including his acceptance of fees solicited from putative class members without court approval, noting that the fee arrangement between the proposed representative plaintiffs’ and Plaintiff's counsel created an “obvious and untenable” conflict giving rise to divided loyalties, thereby rendering counsel unsuitable.

Learn about the recent decision of Greenpeace Canada (2471256 Canada Inc.) v. Ontario (Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks) which has confirmed the potentially significant environmental impact of the use of Ministerial Zoning Orders as well as the government’s obligation to closely consider whether public consultation is required under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993 prior to the enactment of proposed legislation or policy.

The new Blue Box Regulation came into force on June 3, 2021. This regulation shifts the responsibility of operating and paying for Ontario’s recycling program on to Producers of Blue Box Materials. The transition will take place between July 1, 2023 and December 31, 2025; however, there are important registration requirements effective as of this year to be aware of, as detailed below.

Please find below our summaries of the civil decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal for the week of October 4, 2021. There were ten substantive civil decisions this week.

Following the refinancing and repayment of first-ranking debt during a restructuring under the BIA, one of the subsidiaries in the debtor group, Down Under Pipe and Cable Locating Ltd., was solvent again, its only remaining creditor being a related party. Despite its return to solvency, Down Under still faced bankruptcy since the BIA prevents related parties from voting in favour of proposals.

In a Will challenge, it is essential to understand which party bears the burden of proof on which issues, and in what circumstances. It is equally important to understand what kind of evidence will be needed, and the sources of evidence. In part two of this series of articles, Charlotte Hobson shares some information in this regard as imparted at the second session of a recent CPD program dealing with Will challenges.