Articles

About ArticlesLes articles ci-dessous sont publiés par la Section du droit de la construction et infrastructure de l'Association du Barreau de l'Ontario. Les membres sont invités à soumettre des articles.  A propos des articles.

Rédacteurs : Keith Bannon, Lea Nebel

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui
<em>Dismissal for Delay: Southwestern Sales Corp. v. Spurr Bros. Ltd.</em>

Dismissal for Delay: Southwestern Sales Corp. v. Spurr Bros. Ltd.

  • 27 mars 2017
  • David I. Bristow, Q.C.

In July of 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal, in Southwestern Sales Corp. v. Spurr Bros. Ltd., 2016 ONCA 590, delivered judgment in a case of dismissal of six construction lien actions and one trust action for delay.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure
Our Section's Annual Tour

Our Section's Annual Tour

  • 28 février 2017
  • David Debenham

As Toronto Lifemagazine does a feature article on how Toronto’s new Super Jail is “the Billion Dollar Hellhole”, I cannot help but reflect on what an incredible value the Construction and Infrastructure’s annual year-end tours are.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure
<em>Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation (Re), 2016</em> ONSC 7125

Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation (Re), 2016 ONSC 7125

  • 28 février 2017
  • Justin Zuccon

Priority disputes can get messy, especially where there are more than one borrower and mortgagee involved; over a dozen lien claimants asserting their priorities; and multiple advances to different parties in different amounts made at different times under different mortgages and credit facilities.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure
Don’t Scoff at the s.12 Set-Off – Retain Payment from the Multi-Project Claimant

Don’t Scoff at the s.12 Set-Off – Retain Payment from the Multi-Project Claimant

  • 26 janvier 2017
  • Alexander Wilkes

In instances where a party hires a contractor to conduct work on multiple, unrelated projects, the contractor may be owed an undisputed amount on one project, yet the payer may wish to retain this undisputed amount until such time as disputed amounts on a second, unrelated project are addressed.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure
The Vexatious Litigant in Construction Law

The Vexatious Litigant in Construction Law

  • 31 mai 2016
  • David Debenham

David Debenham shares his view on how a particular class of self-represented litigants are damaging the legal system.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure
Bill S-224 – <em>Canada Prompt Payment Act</em> passes first reading

Bill S-224 – Canada Prompt Payment Act passes first reading

  • 27 mai 2016
  • Ted Betts

On April 13, 2016, the Canadian Senate passed the first reading of Bill S-224, An Act respecting payments made under construction contracts, to be known as the Canada Prompt Payment Act. On April 19, Bill S-224 was put on the Order Paper for second reading.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure
Limitation Periods, Forbearance, and Breach of Trust Claims

Limitation Periods, Forbearance, and Breach of Trust Claims

  • 06 mai 2016
  • David Debenham, McMillan

In Employment Professionals Canada Inc. v. Steel Design the Court once again deals with the thorny question of limitation periods where business people decide to forebear on their legal rights, this time in the context of a “prevenient arrangement”. Where labour or materials are supplied under an arrangement or understanding that supplies are provided at a going rate per hour or per item for one project, even if they are not ordered at one time, this is a “prevenient arrangement”.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure