Articles

About ArticlesLes articles ci-dessous sont publiés par la Section du droit constitutionnel, des libertés civiques et des droits de la personne de l'Association du Barreau de l'Ontario. Les membres sont invités à soumettre des articles.  A propos des articles.

Rédacteurs  : Saba Ahmad and Jessica Young

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui

Case Note: R. v. Sulllivan

  • 23 juin 2020
  • Teddy Weinstein

Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code states a person is guilty of a violent offence, even if they were so intoxicated that they did not know what they were doing, so long as that intoxication was self-induced. This month, the Ontario Court of Appeal declared the provision of no force or effect, declaring s. 33.1 unconstitutional for violating sections 7 and 11(d) of the Charter. This note summarizes this important decision.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum

Re-Cap of CCLHR & Elder Law CPD Program: Emergency Measures and the Impact on Older Adults and People with Disabilities

  • 16 juin 2020
  • Deina Warren

On April 22, 2020 as part of the OBA’s Priority PD program the Constitutional, Civil Liberties and Human Rights law section joined with the Elder Law section to address key issues related to emergency measures for older adults, people with disabilities, and the lawyers who represent them. This article provides an overview of that program.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum
Q&A with Peter Engelmann, OBA Award for Excellence in Constitutional, Civil Liberties and Human Rights Law Recipient

Q&A with Peter Engelmann, OBA Award for Excellence in Constitutional, Civil Liberties and Human Rights Law Recipient

  • 08 juin 2020

Peter Engelmann, Partner, Goldblatt Partners, is being honoured this year with the OBA Award for Excellence in Constitutional, Civil Liberties and Human Rights Law for his outstanding leadership and contributions to the field. Find out what motivates him and how he is making a difference in his area of practice in this candid Q&A.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum

New Rules for School: UAlberta Pro-Life v. Governors of the University of Alberta

  • 10 mars 2020
  • Teagan Markin

In UAlberta Pro-Life v. Governors of the University of Alberta, the Alberta Court of Appeal held that a university's regulation of free expression on campus is a form of governmental action subject to Charter scrutiny. The decision sets a new precedent on the application of the Charter to university activities, applies the Doré test on a correctness standard of review, and considers the recent Vavilov decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. This article reviews this noteworthy decision.

Droit de la construction et infrastructure, Student Forum

Can the Government be ‘Cruel’ to a Corporation?

  • 02 mars 2020
  • Ravi Amarnath

Can a corporation challenge a mandatory minimum fine on the basis that it infringes s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? This is the question the Supreme Court of Canada will address in Attorney General of Quebec, et al. v. 9147-0732 Québec Inc., which was argued before the Supreme Court in January 2020 and is currently under reserve.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum

Litigating Human Rights, Labour and Employment Cases before Federal Tribunals

  • 13 février 2020
  • Fiona Campbell and Daniel Fong

On November 25, 2019, the CCLHR section and the Young Lawyers’ section held a joint program on appearing before federal administrative tribunals on human rights, employment, and labour issues. The panel featured two adjudicators and two lawyers, who offered information and advice on issues such as the correct forum for litigating disputes, the speed of dispute resolution before the various tribunals, and practice tips for counsel. This article summarizes the program.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum

Human Rights Application Substantially Similar to Civil Action Seeking Damages for Alleged Workplace Harassment Dismissed on Jurisdictional Grounds

  • 29 novembre 2019
  • Giovanna Di Sauro

A review of a recent HRTO decision, in which an applicant's forum choice resulted in her inability to proceed at both the Tribunal and in court. The decision underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between civil and administrative proceedings, and demonstrates the need to carefully evaluate the powers of administrative tribunals to limit or dismiss proceedings when developing a litigation strategy.

Droit constitutionnel, libertés civiles et droits de la personne, Student Forum